Skip to main content

Last Week Was Not One To Miss

Last week the Dow rose 7.3% last week amid earnings reports from many companies, as reported in the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124782681174757379.html). For most companies, it's not like the reports were necessarily good. It was that the news was not as bad as expected. This rapid rise in the market occurred despite poor economic news, including rising unemployment now predicted to go north of 10%.

To many investors, this seems counter-intuitive: poor economic news and declining earnings reports compared to the same time last year yet the market goes up markedly. How come? It's quite simple actually. The market looks forward and reacts to new and unknowable information. So even though the news was bad, much of it was not as bad as expected. Thus the new information positively changed market expectations and prices adjusted upward.

Unless you can predict the future, as investors we must stay invested through good times and bad to ensure we experience the positive results the market historically provides. Several studies show how the market provides its returns in short-bursts, as it did last week. (Click here to see the impact of missing the 12 best months from 1979-2008 http://www.truewealthdesign.com/content.cfm?ContentID=1564).

Alternatively, some investors try a market timing approach. Market timing is an attempt to forecast the market’s direction, pulling money out in anticipation of a downturn and reinvesting when it seems likely that prices will move higher. The events that move markets are virtually unpredictable, so market timing is essentially trying to predict the future--crystal ball anyone?

While a market timer may get lucky in the short run, numerous academic studies have showed that market timers yield results significantly lower than a passive buy-and-hold type investor. The markets run up last week amid poor economic news is an example of how market timing can severely hurt investor's returns. Another example can be seen in investors who fled stocks in October after a painful eight-day, 23% slide in the S&P 500, because on October 13, these investors may have also missed a major 12% one-day gain. This illustrates the point that episodes of falling prices can be clustered with episodes of rising prices.

So while it may be unsettling to some to have to endure the downs to experience the ups, there is no other way to ensure that market returns will be realized. If an investor cannot maintain his or her allocation during negative markets, the portfolio should be adjusted more conservatively and done so permanently. Trying to get back in when the news is good will likely lead to disappointment and under performance.

For a short video to expand on this subject, click here to hear Professor Ken French discuss whether Stockholders Should Sit This One Out.

http://www.dimensional.com/famafrench/2009/07/should-stockholders-sit-this-one-out.html#more



To Your Prosperity ~ Kevin Kroskey

Popular posts from this blog

Diversification: Disciplinarian of Disciplinarians

Disciplined diversification works when you do and even when you don't want it to. Diversification in effect forces you to sell the thing that has been doing so well in your portfolio and to buy the thing that hasn't. While this makes rational sense, it is emotionally difficult to execute. Think back to the tail end of 2008--were you selling bonds and cash to buy stocks? Most likely you weren't unless your advisor or some sort of automatic trigger did it for you. Carl Richards of www.behaviorgap.com provided a good reminder of how diversification works in a recent NY Times blog post. The diversification he discusses here is more so related to equity asset-class diversification but also touches on the three basic building blocks--equities, bonds, and cash. He doesn't discuss alternative asset classes -- an asset class that doesn't fit neatly into the three basic categories -- being used to further diversification, but that's a detailed topic for another day.

The Value of Double-Checking & Monitoring Your Retirement Strategy

Motivational speaker Denis Waitley once remarked, “You must stick to your conviction, but be ready to abandon your assumptions.” That statement certainly applies to retirement planning. Your effort must not waver, yet you must also examine it from time to time. 1       Perhaps you may realize that you under-estimated your health insurance costs and will need more retirement income than previously assumed. Or perhaps, with today's low interest rates you are not getting the level of investment returns you counted on. With those factors and others in mind, here are some signs that you may need to double-check your retirement strategy.     Your portfolio lacks significant diversification. Many baby boomers are approaching retirement with portfolios heavily weighted in U.S. equities. As many of them will have long retirements and a sustained need for growth investing, you could argue that this is entirely appropriate. Yet, U.S. equities by some measures may be over-valued by

65-80 Year Olds … A New and Exciting Demography

Should today’s 70-year-old American be considered “old?” How do you define that term these days? Statistically, your average 70-year-old has just a 2% chance of dying within a year. The estimated upper limits of average life expectancy is now 97, and a rapidly growing number of 70-year-olds will live past age 100. Perhaps more importantly, today’s 70-year-olds are in much better shape than their grandparents were at the same age. In most developed countries, healthy life expectancy from age 50 is growing faster than life expectancy itself, suggesting that the period of diminished vigor and ill health towards the end of life is being compressed. A recent series of articles in the Economist magazine suggest that we need a new term for people age 65 to 80, who are generally healthy and hearty, capable of knowledge-based work on an equal footing with 25-year-olds, and who are increasingly being shunted out of the workforce as if they were invalids or, well, “old.” Indeed, the a