Skip to main content

The Best of Times, the Worst of Times

Below is a brief article from Weston Wellington of Dimensional Fund Advisors, reviewing the markets over the last year and concurrent headlines from the media. It always helps to keep things in perspective and not get caught up in the financial pornography that is put upon us.

-Kevin Kroskey

---------

For the twelve-month period ending May 31, 2011, equity investors around the world enjoyed the equivalent of blue skies and bright sunshine while the economic news was partly cloudy at best. Among forty-five developed and emerging-country stock markets tracked by MSCI, all but four had double-digit total returns (in US dollar terms), and twenty-six had returns of 30% or more.

If someone had told us a year ago that global markets would stage such a broad-based rally, we would have been inclined to think that trends in employment, housing, and financial distress were about to take a pronounced turn for the better. It seems hard to argue they have done anything of the sort. Somehow, despite gloomy financial page news that keeps repeating itself, equity prices marched substantially higher.

The moral of the story? Investors should be skeptical of their ability to predict future events and even more skeptical of their ability to predict how other investors will react to them.

Last Year's Headlines
This Year's Headlines
"Europe Crisis Deepens as Chaos Grips Greece"
Sebastian Moffett and Alkman Granitsas. Wall Street Journal, May 6, 2010
"Greek Woes Fuel Fresh Fears"
Marcus Walker and Hannah Benjamin. Wall Street Journal, May 10, 2011

"Fearful Investors Are Pulling Out"
Adam Shell. USA Today, May 20, 2010

"Fear Wins: Stocks Resume Long Slide"
Adam Shell. USA Today, June 16, 2011
"Housing Prices Remain Weak"
Sara Murray. Wall Street Journal, May 26, 2010

"Home Market Takes a Tumble"
Nick Timiraos and Dawn Wotapka. Wall Street Journal, May 9, 2011
"Fear Returns—How to Avoid a Double-Dip Recession"
Cover story. Economist, May 29, 2010

"The World Economy—Sticky Patch or Meltdown?"
Cover story. Economist, June 18, 2011

"Spill Tops Valdez Disaster—Deep Trouble: There Was 'Nobody in Charge'"
J. Weisman, G. Chazan and S. Power. Wall Street Journal, May 28, 2010
"Japanese Nuclear Crisis Is Ranked at the Level of Chernobyl"
Mitsuru Obe.Wall Street Journal, April 12, 2011
"Discouraging Job Growth Batters Stocks"
Don Lee. Los Angeles Times, June 5, 2010

"Jobs Data Stoke US Recovery Fears"
Robin Harding, S. Bond and M. Mackenzie. Financial Times, June 4, 2011
"Economic Outlook Darkens"
Jonathan Cheng and Justin Lahart. Wall Street Journal, June 2, 2010

"Stocks Plunge Amid Fears That Global Economy is Slowing"
Christina Hauser. New York Times, June 11, 2011

"Bond Fund Managers See Signs of a Bubble"
Sam Mamudi. Wall Street Journal, June 8, 2010

"Why Are Investors Still Lining Up for Bonds?"
Jeff Sommer. New York Times, May 29, 2011
"Rapid Declines Rattle Even Optimists"
E.S. Browning. Wall Street Journal, June 14, 2010

"Investors Shaken by the Fear Factor"
James Mackintosh. Financial Times, June 18, 2011

Popular posts from this blog

Diversification: Disciplinarian of Disciplinarians

Disciplined diversification works when you do and even when you don't want it to. Diversification in effect forces you to sell the thing that has been doing so well in your portfolio and to buy the thing that hasn't. While this makes rational sense, it is emotionally difficult to execute. Think back to the tail end of 2008--were you selling bonds and cash to buy stocks? Most likely you weren't unless your advisor or some sort of automatic trigger did it for you. Carl Richards of www.behaviorgap.com provided a good reminder of how diversification works in a recent NY Times blog post. The diversification he discusses here is more so related to equity asset-class diversification but also touches on the three basic building blocks--equities, bonds, and cash. He doesn't discuss alternative asset classes -- an asset class that doesn't fit neatly into the three basic categories -- being used to further diversification, but that's a detailed topic for another day.

The Value of Double-Checking & Monitoring Your Retirement Strategy

Motivational speaker Denis Waitley once remarked, “You must stick to your conviction, but be ready to abandon your assumptions.” That statement certainly applies to retirement planning. Your effort must not waver, yet you must also examine it from time to time. 1       Perhaps you may realize that you under-estimated your health insurance costs and will need more retirement income than previously assumed. Or perhaps, with today's low interest rates you are not getting the level of investment returns you counted on. With those factors and others in mind, here are some signs that you may need to double-check your retirement strategy.     Your portfolio lacks significant diversification. Many baby boomers are approaching retirement with portfolios heavily weighted in U.S. equities. As many of them will have long retirements and a sustained need for growth investing, you could argue that this is entirely appropriate. Yet, U.S. equities by some measures may be over-valued by

65-80 Year Olds … A New and Exciting Demography

Should today’s 70-year-old American be considered “old?” How do you define that term these days? Statistically, your average 70-year-old has just a 2% chance of dying within a year. The estimated upper limits of average life expectancy is now 97, and a rapidly growing number of 70-year-olds will live past age 100. Perhaps more importantly, today’s 70-year-olds are in much better shape than their grandparents were at the same age. In most developed countries, healthy life expectancy from age 50 is growing faster than life expectancy itself, suggesting that the period of diminished vigor and ill health towards the end of life is being compressed. A recent series of articles in the Economist magazine suggest that we need a new term for people age 65 to 80, who are generally healthy and hearty, capable of knowledge-based work on an equal footing with 25-year-olds, and who are increasingly being shunted out of the workforce as if they were invalids or, well, “old.” Indeed, the a