Skip to main content

Retiring Solo

Most retirement planning literature portrays a retirement transition in the context of a couple or a family – but what about those who retire alone? What particular challenges do they face, and how must their preparation for retirement differ?
 
Retiring alone presents unique challenges. Singles who retire may lack a spousal and familial support network other retirees count on. If a lone retiree faces sizable medical bills, he or she can’t draw on the financial resources of a spouse. Unmarried, childless retirees also lack adult sons and daughters who might be able to offer them financial help or serve as executors of their estates one day.

Singles must plan ahead for them.The earlier, the better: A basic financial truth can’t be dismissed: single retirees will need to amass savings comparable to those of a retired couple.

Why? It is because many retirement costs are fixed. Hospitals, universities, banks, pharmacies, mechanics and home improvement specialists do not offer discounts to single parents or lone retirees nor does your county when collecting property taxes. Usually, a couple can absorb these costs more effectively than an individual.

Income taxes. Singles go into the 25% federal tax bracket at $35,350 of taxable income. Married couples don't get into the 25% bracket until $70,700 of income. Single filers will generally pay a higher effective tax rate compared to married filers.

Some steps to consider. Those looking at the possibility of a solo retirement may want to think about these factors...

The need to save early & consistently. Think about increasing your savings rate. It is possible: consider how much parents save for their kids’ tuition, food, clothing and child care, in the face of economic pressures that may exceed your own.

The possible need for long-term care coverage. According to NPR, only about 8 million of 313 million Americans have any long-term care insurance. The average private room accommodation in a nursing home is currently $87,000 a year. The 2012 Long-Term Care Insurance Price Index of the American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance (AALTCI) estimates that a single 55-year-old would pay an average of $1,720 a year for LTCI with an immediate value of $170,000 and a value of $354,000 at age 80 – a purchase that may very well be worth it given trends in American longevity. Many people investigate buying LTCI as they turn 50; you may want to take a look at it in your forties.1 

The value of a social circle. “Family” has many different definitions today – and increasingly, single retirees are creating family-like bonds by moving in with one another, and saving household expenses as well. This can be good for the soul, and some solo retirees with few or no living relatives go so far as to assign power of attorney to a close friend in case of emergency.

These are all crucial factors to think about if you find yourself thinking that you may retire alone. Contemplate them, and consider planning accordingly.

Kevin Kroskey

This article prepared in conjunction with Peter Montoya.
Citations.
1 - www.npr.org/2012/05/08/151970188/long-term-care-insurance-who-needs-it [5/8/12]

This material was prepared by MarketingLibrary.Net Inc., and does not necessarily represent the views of the presenting party, nor their affiliates. Marketing Library.Net Inc. is not affiliated with any broker or brokerage firm that may be providing this information to you. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. Please note - investing involves risk, and past performance is no guarantee of future results. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. This information should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice and may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any Federal tax penalty. This is not a solicitation or a recommendation to purchase or sell any investment or insurance product or service, and should not be relied upon as such. All indices are unmanaged and are not illustrative of any particular investment.

Popular posts from this blog

Diversification: Disciplinarian of Disciplinarians

Disciplined diversification works when you do and even when you don't want it to. Diversification in effect forces you to sell the thing that has been doing so well in your portfolio and to buy the thing that hasn't. While this makes rational sense, it is emotionally difficult to execute. Think back to the tail end of 2008--were you selling bonds and cash to buy stocks? Most likely you weren't unless your advisor or some sort of automatic trigger did it for you. Carl Richards of www.behaviorgap.com provided a good reminder of how diversification works in a recent NY Times blog post. The diversification he discusses here is more so related to equity asset-class diversification but also touches on the three basic building blocks--equities, bonds, and cash. He doesn't discuss alternative asset classes -- an asset class that doesn't fit neatly into the three basic categories -- being used to further diversification, but that's a detailed topic for another day.

The Value of Double-Checking & Monitoring Your Retirement Strategy

Motivational speaker Denis Waitley once remarked, “You must stick to your conviction, but be ready to abandon your assumptions.” That statement certainly applies to retirement planning. Your effort must not waver, yet you must also examine it from time to time. 1       Perhaps you may realize that you under-estimated your health insurance costs and will need more retirement income than previously assumed. Or perhaps, with today's low interest rates you are not getting the level of investment returns you counted on. With those factors and others in mind, here are some signs that you may need to double-check your retirement strategy.     Your portfolio lacks significant diversification. Many baby boomers are approaching retirement with portfolios heavily weighted in U.S. equities. As many of them will have long retirements and a sustained need for growth investing, you could argue that this is entirely appropriate. Yet, U.S. equities by some measures may be over-valued by

65-80 Year Olds … A New and Exciting Demography

Should today’s 70-year-old American be considered “old?” How do you define that term these days? Statistically, your average 70-year-old has just a 2% chance of dying within a year. The estimated upper limits of average life expectancy is now 97, and a rapidly growing number of 70-year-olds will live past age 100. Perhaps more importantly, today’s 70-year-olds are in much better shape than their grandparents were at the same age. In most developed countries, healthy life expectancy from age 50 is growing faster than life expectancy itself, suggesting that the period of diminished vigor and ill health towards the end of life is being compressed. A recent series of articles in the Economist magazine suggest that we need a new term for people age 65 to 80, who are generally healthy and hearty, capable of knowledge-based work on an equal footing with 25-year-olds, and who are increasingly being shunted out of the workforce as if they were invalids or, well, “old.” Indeed, the a