Skip to main content

2014 IRA Deadlines Are Approaching

Financially, many of us associate April with taxes – but we should also associate April with important IRA deadlines.
 
*April 1 is the absolute deadline to take an initial IRA Required Mandatory Distribution (RMD).
*April 15 is the deadline for making annual contributions to a traditional or Roth IRA.1,2,7
 
Let’s discuss the contribution deadline first, and then the deadline for that first RMD (which affects only those IRA owners who turned 70½ last year).
 
The earlier you make your annual IRA contribution, the better. You can make a yearly Roth or traditional IRA contribution anytime between January 1 of the current year and April 15 of the next year. For example, you can make your IRA contribution for 2014 anytime from January 1, 2014-April 15, 2015.  The IRA contribution window for 2013 is January 1, 2013- April 15, 2014.1
 
So you have more than 15 months to make your IRA contribution for a given year. But why wait? Savvy IRA owners pour new money into their accounts each January – as early as they can – to give those dollars more months to grow and compound. However, for those on the bubble of eligibility should generally wait until a draft tax return is prepared to avoid having to do cumbersome fixes.
 
You cut your income tax bill by contributing to a deductible traditional IRA. That’s because you are funding it with after-tax dollars. To get the full tax deduction for a 2014 traditional IRA contribution, you have to meet one or more of these financial conditions:
  • You aren’t eligible to participate in a workplace retirement plan.
  • You are eligible to participate in a workplace retirement plan, but you are a single filer with adjusted gross income of $59,000 or less. (Or if you file jointly with your spouse, your combined AGI is $95,000 or less.) Given the low thresholds, not many can contribute.
  • You aren’t eligible to participate in a workplace retirement plan, but your spouse is eligible and your combined 2014 gross income is $178,000 or less.2,3  This often works well for many families where one spouse works and one does not.
If you are the initial owner of a traditional IRA, by law you are required to stop making contributions to that IRA starting in the year you turn 70½. If you are the initial owner of a Roth IRA, you can contribute to it as long as you live.4
 
If you are making a 2013 IRA contribution in early 2014, be aware of this fact. You must tell the investment company hosting the IRA account what year the contribution is for. If you fail to indicate the tax year that the contribution applies to, the custodian firm may make a default assumption that the contribution is for the current year (and note exactly that to the IRS).1
 
So, write “2014 IRA contribution” or “2013 IRA contribution” as applicable in the memo area of your check, plainly and simply. Be sure to write your account number on the check. Should you make your contribution electronically, double-check that these details are communicated.
 
How much can you put into an IRA this year? You can contribute up to $5,500 to a Roth or traditional IRA for the 2014 tax year (just as you could for the 2013 tax year). If you are age 50 or better another $1,000 can be contributed. Should you contribute in excess of $5,500, you will not be rewarded for it: you have until the following April 15 to correct the contribution with the help of an IRS form, and if you don’t, the amount of the excess contribution will be taxed at 6% each year the correction is avoided.5 
 
If you earn a lot of money, your maximum contribution to a Roth IRA may be reduced because of income (MAGI) phase-outs, as follows.6
 
2013 Tax Year                                                          2014 Tax Year
Single/head of household: $112,000-127,000         Single/head of household: $114,000-129,000
Married couples: $178,000-188,000                        Married couples: $181,000-191,000
 
You can’t make a Roth IRA contribution if you are married filing separately with MAGI of $10,000 or more and lived with your spouse in any part of a year.6
 
A last-chance RMD deadline rolls around on April 1. If you turned 70½ in 2013, the IRS gave you a choice: you could a) take your first Required Minimum Distribution from your traditional IRA before December 31, 2013, or b) postpone it until as late as April 1, 2014.7
 
If you chose b), you will have to take two RMDs this year – one by April 1, 2014 and another by December 31, 2014. (For subsequent years, your annual RMD deadline will be December 31.) The investment firm hosting your IRA should have already notified you of this consequence, and the RMD amount(s) – in fact, they have probably calculated the RMD(s) for you.7
 
Original owners of Roth IRAs will never face this issue – they are not required to take RMDs.7
 
Best Regards,
 
Kevin Kroskey, CFP®, MBA
 
This article adapted with permission from MarketingLibrary.net, Inc.
 
Citations.
1 - taxmap.ntis.gov/taxmap/pubs/p590-005.htm [1/16/14]
2 - turbotax.intuit.com/tax-tools/tax-tips/Tax-Planning-and-Checklists/Tax-Tips-After-January-1--2014/INF12070.html [3/8/13]
3 - money.cnn.com/retirement/guide/IRA_traditional.moneymag/index2.htm [1/16/14]
4 - money.cnn.com/retirement/guide/IRA_Roth.moneymag/index3.htm [1/16/14]
5 - finance.yahoo.com/news/over-contributed-ira-401-k-151500104.html [1/2/14]
6 -  irs.gov/publications/p590/ar01.html [2013]
7 - foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2014/01/02/missed-your-ira-rmd-deadline-here-what-to-do/ [1/2/14]

Popular posts from this blog

Diversification: Disciplinarian of Disciplinarians

Disciplined diversification works when you do and even when you don't want it to. Diversification in effect forces you to sell the thing that has been doing so well in your portfolio and to buy the thing that hasn't. While this makes rational sense, it is emotionally difficult to execute. Think back to the tail end of 2008--were you selling bonds and cash to buy stocks? Most likely you weren't unless your advisor or some sort of automatic trigger did it for you. Carl Richards of www.behaviorgap.com provided a good reminder of how diversification works in a recent NY Times blog post. The diversification he discusses here is more so related to equity asset-class diversification but also touches on the three basic building blocks--equities, bonds, and cash. He doesn't discuss alternative asset classes -- an asset class that doesn't fit neatly into the three basic categories -- being used to further diversification, but that's a detailed topic for another day.

The Value of Double-Checking & Monitoring Your Retirement Strategy

Motivational speaker Denis Waitley once remarked, “You must stick to your conviction, but be ready to abandon your assumptions.” That statement certainly applies to retirement planning. Your effort must not waver, yet you must also examine it from time to time. 1       Perhaps you may realize that you under-estimated your health insurance costs and will need more retirement income than previously assumed. Or perhaps, with today's low interest rates you are not getting the level of investment returns you counted on. With those factors and others in mind, here are some signs that you may need to double-check your retirement strategy.     Your portfolio lacks significant diversification. Many baby boomers are approaching retirement with portfolios heavily weighted in U.S. equities. As many of them will have long retirements and a sustained need for growth investing, you could argue that this is entirely appropriate. Yet, U.S. equities by some measures may be over-valued by

65-80 Year Olds … A New and Exciting Demography

Should today’s 70-year-old American be considered “old?” How do you define that term these days? Statistically, your average 70-year-old has just a 2% chance of dying within a year. The estimated upper limits of average life expectancy is now 97, and a rapidly growing number of 70-year-olds will live past age 100. Perhaps more importantly, today’s 70-year-olds are in much better shape than their grandparents were at the same age. In most developed countries, healthy life expectancy from age 50 is growing faster than life expectancy itself, suggesting that the period of diminished vigor and ill health towards the end of life is being compressed. A recent series of articles in the Economist magazine suggest that we need a new term for people age 65 to 80, who are generally healthy and hearty, capable of knowledge-based work on an equal footing with 25-year-olds, and who are increasingly being shunted out of the workforce as if they were invalids or, well, “old.” Indeed, the a