Skip to main content

Are Your Kids Delaying Your Retirement and Are You Delaying Their Self-Sufficiency?

It seems that the wealthier you are, the greater your chances of financially helping your adult children. Pew Research Center data compiled in late 2014 revealed that 38% of American parents had given financial assistance to their grown children in the past 12 months, including 73% of higher-income parents.1  
 
The latest Bank of America/USA Today Better Money Habits Millennial Report shows that 22% of 30- to 34-year-olds get financial help from their moms and dads. Twenty percent of married or cohabiting millennials receive such help as well.
 
Do these households feel burdened? According to the Pew survey, the answer is no. 89% of parents who had helped their grown children financially said it was emotionally rewarding to do so. Just 30% said it was stressful.1
 
Other surveys paint a different picture. 
 
Earlier this year, the financial research firm Hearts & Wallets presented a poll of 5,500 U.S. households headed by baby boomers. The major finding: boomers who were not supporting their adult children were nearly 2½ times more likely to be fully retired than their peers (52% versus 21%).
 
In TD Ameritrade’s 2015 Financial Disruptions Survey, 66% of Americans said their long-term saving and retirement plans had been disrupted by external circumstances -- what I affectionately call 'life' -- and 24% cited “supporting others” as the reason. In addition, the Hearts & Wallets researchers said that boomers who lent financial assistance to their grown children were 25% more likely to report “heightened financial anxiety” than other boomers; 52% were ill at ease about assuming investment risk.3,4
 
Economic factors pressure young adults to turn to the bank of Mom & Dad. 
 
Thirty or forty years ago, it was more plausible for a young couple to buy a home, raise a couple of kids and save 5-10% percent of their incomes. For millennials, many of whom are shouldered with large amounts of student loan debt, that is more difficult today. In fact, the savings rate for Americans younger than 35 now stands at -1.8%.5 
 
Housing costs are high and so are tuition costs. The jobs they accept frequently pay too little and lack the kind of employee benefits preceding generations could count on. The Bank of America/USA Today survey found that 20% of millennials carrying education debt had put off starting a family because of it. The average monthly student loan payment for a millennial was $201.
 
Since 2007, the inflation-adjusted median wage for Americans aged 25-34 has declined in nearly every major industry (health care being the exception). According to Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco data: while overall U.S. wages rose 15% between 2007-14, wages for entry-level business and finance jobs only rose 2.6% in that period.5,6 
 
It may be wonderful to help, but you must be measured and clear in providing help. 
 
Studies show that parents should not offer open-ended financial help. In the extreme, Ted Klontz, PhD calls this money disorder of well-intentioned parents "Financial Enabling" and describes this and other money disorders in detail in his book "Mind Over Money." Klontz says there is often an underlying and often unconscious motivator driving the parents when financially enabling. Perhaps to assuage gilt for not being a good parent or not being around enough during childhood could be motivators. 
 
Setting expectations is only reasonable: establishing the amount of the support and deadline when the support ends is another step toward instilling financial responsibility in your son or daughter. A contract, a rental agreement, a formal loan with promissory note and repayment terms are all good measures to help convey clear expectations. This way you can help your child financially through their troubles without inhibiting them to financially spread their wings and become self-sufficient.  
 
With no ground rules and the bank of Mom and Dad providing financial assistance without end, a “boomerang” son or daughter may become financially dependent for years or decades. In addition, what happens when a grandchild comes on the scene before the child becomes financially self-sufficient? Now the dependents have multiplied and with obviously no fault to the grandchild. Talk about a conundrum! 
 
Setting clear expectations and sticking to them is not mean but necessary. You only get one shot at retirement. Your children have a long runway to make things right.

Best Regards,

Kevin Kroskey, CFP, MBA
 
This article adapted by Kevin Kroskey with permission from MarketingLibrary.net, Inc.

Citations.

1 - pewsocialtrends.org/2015/05/21/5-helping-adult-children/ [5/21/15]
2 - newsroom.bankofamerica.com/press-releases/consumer-banking/parents-great-recession-influence-millennial-money-views-and-habits/ [4/21/15]
3 - marketwatch.com/story/are-your-kids-ruining-your-retirement-2015-05-05 [5/5/15]
4 - amtd.com/newsroom/press-releases/press-release-details/2015/Financial-Disruptions-Cost-Americans-25-Trillion-in-Lost-Retirement-Savings/default.aspx [2/17/15]
5 - theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/12/millennials-arent-saving-money-because-theyre-not-making-money/383338/ [12/3/14]
6 - theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/07/millennial-entry-level-wages-terrible-horrible-just-really-bad/374884/ [7/23/14]

 

Popular posts from this blog

Diversification: Disciplinarian of Disciplinarians

Disciplined diversification works when you do and even when you don't want it to. Diversification in effect forces you to sell the thing that has been doing so well in your portfolio and to buy the thing that hasn't. While this makes rational sense, it is emotionally difficult to execute. Think back to the tail end of 2008--were you selling bonds and cash to buy stocks? Most likely you weren't unless your advisor or some sort of automatic trigger did it for you. Carl Richards of www.behaviorgap.com provided a good reminder of how diversification works in a recent NY Times blog post. The diversification he discusses here is more so related to equity asset-class diversification but also touches on the three basic building blocks--equities, bonds, and cash. He doesn't discuss alternative asset classes -- an asset class that doesn't fit neatly into the three basic categories -- being used to further diversification, but that's a detailed topic for another day.

The Value of Double-Checking & Monitoring Your Retirement Strategy

Motivational speaker Denis Waitley once remarked, “You must stick to your conviction, but be ready to abandon your assumptions.” That statement certainly applies to retirement planning. Your effort must not waver, yet you must also examine it from time to time. 1       Perhaps you may realize that you under-estimated your health insurance costs and will need more retirement income than previously assumed. Or perhaps, with today's low interest rates you are not getting the level of investment returns you counted on. With those factors and others in mind, here are some signs that you may need to double-check your retirement strategy.     Your portfolio lacks significant diversification. Many baby boomers are approaching retirement with portfolios heavily weighted in U.S. equities. As many of them will have long retirements and a sustained need for growth investing, you could argue that this is entirely appropriate. Yet, U.S. equities by some measures may be over-valued by

65-80 Year Olds … A New and Exciting Demography

Should today’s 70-year-old American be considered “old?” How do you define that term these days? Statistically, your average 70-year-old has just a 2% chance of dying within a year. The estimated upper limits of average life expectancy is now 97, and a rapidly growing number of 70-year-olds will live past age 100. Perhaps more importantly, today’s 70-year-olds are in much better shape than their grandparents were at the same age. In most developed countries, healthy life expectancy from age 50 is growing faster than life expectancy itself, suggesting that the period of diminished vigor and ill health towards the end of life is being compressed. A recent series of articles in the Economist magazine suggest that we need a new term for people age 65 to 80, who are generally healthy and hearty, capable of knowledge-based work on an equal footing with 25-year-olds, and who are increasingly being shunted out of the workforce as if they were invalids or, well, “old.” Indeed, the a