Skip to main content

Biases Affecting Your Brain and Financial Decision Making, As Told By Real Vs. Imagined Crime

Image
By
Crime in America is totally out of control these days, right? Every day you read about some new shooting, robbery, kidnapping etc., and the impression you get is that we live in an age where the streets are not safe and neither is your home.
 
Some of this phenomenon is not crime-related at all. Rather, it is in part stemming from a cognitive bias our brains experience called the recency or availability bias. From Wikipedia, “The tendency to overestimate the likelihood of events with greater "availability" in memory, which can be influenced by how recent the memories are or how unusual or emotionally charged they may be.” 
 
This bias shows may perpetrate your brain after being exposed to various emotionally charged stories and experiences. With money, for example, in the Great Recession in 2008, the recency bias may have caused you to think that the stock market is only going to continue to go down and not recover, given the recency, availability of information and media stories, and emotional reaction the severe stock market decline caused for many at that time. 
 
As for crime, when the Pew Research Center looked at the FBI figures for the quarter century from 1993 through 2015, they came to a somewhat different conclusion than what may be in our brain. Crime in America is actually falling at an impressive rate, when measured by violent crime per 100,000 residents, violent victimizations per 1,000 people, property crime per 100,000 residents or property victimizations per 1,000 households. (See chart) The news about crime, despite relentless headlines and campaign slogans, is almost uniformly good—and has been for some time.
 
The FBI data covers 18,000 different U.S. jurisdictions, while the victimization figures come from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The former reflects reported crimes only, while the latter is a series of polls of individuals who are asked whether they were victims of a crime in the past six months, whether they reported it or not. The decline in violent crime ranged from 50% (FBI statistics) to 77% (BJS data), while the drop in property crime ranged from 48% to 69% respectively.
 
It appears that this story is not getting out to a mainstream audience. Twenty-one Gallup surveys conducted since 1989 show that most Americans believed there was more crime in the U.S. compared with the year before, despite the general trend downward. In late 2016, a Pew Research Center survey found that 57% of registered voters believed crime had gotten worse since 2008, even though the actual statistics showed that violent and property crime rates had declined by double-digit percentages during that span.
 
Where are you more likely to be a victim in our safer world? The reports show that there were more than 600 violent crimes per 100,000 residents in the states of Alaska, Nevada, New Mexico, and Tennessee. The least violent states, with fewer than 200 violent crimes per 100,000 residents, were Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Virginia. Chicago has drawn widespread attention for its murder rate, but the actual rate in 2015—18 murders and non-negligent manslaughters per 100,000 residents—was far lower than the rate in two cities that are not making the news: St. Louis (59) and Baltimore (55). 


To Your Prosperity,

Kevin Kroskey, CFP®, MBA

This article adapted with permission from BobVeres.com.
Source: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/21/5-facts-about-crime-in-the-u-s/
 

Popular posts from this blog

Diversification: Disciplinarian of Disciplinarians

By
Disciplined diversification works when you do and even when you don't want it to. Diversification in effect forces you to sell the thing that has been doing so well in your portfolio and to buy the thing that hasn't. While this makes rational sense, it is emotionally difficult to execute. Think back to the tail end of 2008--were you selling bonds and cash to buy stocks? Most likely you weren't unless your advisor or some sort of automatic trigger did it for you. Carl Richards of www.behaviorgap.com provided a good reminder of how diversification works in a recent NY Times blog post. The diversification he discusses here is more so related to equity asset-class diversification but also touches on the three basic building blocks--equities, bonds, and cash. He doesn't discuss alternative asset classes -- an asset class that doesn't fit neatly into the three basic categories -- being used to further diversification, but that's a detailed topic for another day.
Read more

The Value of Double-Checking & Monitoring Your Retirement Strategy

By
Motivational speaker Denis Waitley once remarked, “You must stick to your conviction, but be ready to abandon your assumptions.” That statement certainly applies to retirement planning. Your effort must not waver, yet you must also examine it from time to time. 1       Perhaps you may realize that you under-estimated your health insurance costs and will need more retirement income than previously assumed. Or perhaps, with today's low interest rates you are not getting the level of investment returns you counted on. With those factors and others in mind, here are some signs that you may need to double-check your retirement strategy.     Your portfolio lacks significant diversification. Many baby boomers are approaching retirement with portfolios heavily weighted in U.S. equities. As many of them will have long retirements and a sustained need for growth investing, you could argue that this is entirely appropriate. Yet, U.S. equities by some measures may be over-valued by
Read more

65-80 Year Olds … A New and Exciting Demography

By
Should today’s 70-year-old American be considered “old?” How do you define that term these days? Statistically, your average 70-year-old has just a 2% chance of dying within a year. The estimated upper limits of average life expectancy is now 97, and a rapidly growing number of 70-year-olds will live past age 100. Perhaps more importantly, today’s 70-year-olds are in much better shape than their grandparents were at the same age. In most developed countries, healthy life expectancy from age 50 is growing faster than life expectancy itself, suggesting that the period of diminished vigor and ill health towards the end of life is being compressed. A recent series of articles in the Economist magazine suggest that we need a new term for people age 65 to 80, who are generally healthy and hearty, capable of knowledge-based work on an equal footing with 25-year-olds, and who are increasingly being shunted out of the workforce as if they were invalids or, well, “old.” Indeed, the a
Read more