Skip to main content

2013 Key Tax Proposals

On February 13, President Obama's Fiscal Year 2013 budget was released. Follow this link to get a full copy of the 2013 Budget. The Treasury's Green Book containing general explanations of the Administration's revenue proposals can be found here.

Robert Keebler, a leading professional in the area of tax and estate planning, highlighted some of the key proposals potentially affecting taxpayers below:
  • Extend Bush tax cuts for all but the top two brackets. The only change would be to have the 33% and 35% rates go back to their pre-2001 levels of 36% and 39.6%. Taxpayers in the top two marginal brackets would still benefit from reduced rates on the portion of their income taxed in the lower brackets.
  • Raise the long-term capital gains rate to 20% for single taxpayers making more than $200,000 per year, $250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly and $125,000 for married taxpayers filing separately.
  • Tax rate on qualified dividends would revert to ordinary income tax rates (up to 39.6%) for the same taxpayers. For everyone else, the rate would stay at 15% (or 0%)
  • Tax carried interest as ordinary income.
  • Reduce value of itemized deductions for taxpayers in the 33 and 35% brackets to 28% (33% bracket current starts at $178,650 for single taxpayers and $217,450 for married filing jointly.
  • Reinstate the personal exemption phase-out for upper income taxpayers
  • Extend reduction of social security tax on self-employed from 14.2% to 12.2% for the rest of 2012.
  • Enact a permanent AMT Patch.
  • Make the HOPE tax credit permanent. The credit is worth up to $2,500 per year.
  • Make recent expansions of the low-income tax credit permanent.
  • Restore the estate, gift and GST tax to 2009 rates.
  • Require a minimum term for GRATs of ten years.
  • Limit the duration of GST tax exemption to 90 years.
It is highly unlikely--approaching a 0% change--that tax reform will be taken up during the 2012 election year. If nothing is done, the Bush tax cuts will sunset to Clinton-era rates. Perhaps Congress will extend current rates for another year and take up reform in 2013.

Stay tuned...

Kevin Kroskey

    Popular posts from this blog

    Diversification: Disciplinarian of Disciplinarians

    Disciplined diversification works when you do and even when you don't want it to. Diversification in effect forces you to sell the thing that has been doing so well in your portfolio and to buy the thing that hasn't. While this makes rational sense, it is emotionally difficult to execute. Think back to the tail end of 2008--were you selling bonds and cash to buy stocks? Most likely you weren't unless your advisor or some sort of automatic trigger did it for you. Carl Richards of www.behaviorgap.com provided a good reminder of how diversification works in a recent NY Times blog post. The diversification he discusses here is more so related to equity asset-class diversification but also touches on the three basic building blocks--equities, bonds, and cash. He doesn't discuss alternative asset classes -- an asset class that doesn't fit neatly into the three basic categories -- being used to further diversification, but that's a detailed topic for another day.

    The Value of Double-Checking & Monitoring Your Retirement Strategy

    Motivational speaker Denis Waitley once remarked, “You must stick to your conviction, but be ready to abandon your assumptions.” That statement certainly applies to retirement planning. Your effort must not waver, yet you must also examine it from time to time. 1       Perhaps you may realize that you under-estimated your health insurance costs and will need more retirement income than previously assumed. Or perhaps, with today's low interest rates you are not getting the level of investment returns you counted on. With those factors and others in mind, here are some signs that you may need to double-check your retirement strategy.     Your portfolio lacks significant diversification. Many baby boomers are approaching retirement with portfolios heavily weighted in U.S. equities. As many of them will have long retirements and a sustained need for growth investing, you could argue that this is entirely appropriate. Yet, U.S. equities by some measures may be over-valued by

    65-80 Year Olds … A New and Exciting Demography

    Should today’s 70-year-old American be considered “old?” How do you define that term these days? Statistically, your average 70-year-old has just a 2% chance of dying within a year. The estimated upper limits of average life expectancy is now 97, and a rapidly growing number of 70-year-olds will live past age 100. Perhaps more importantly, today’s 70-year-olds are in much better shape than their grandparents were at the same age. In most developed countries, healthy life expectancy from age 50 is growing faster than life expectancy itself, suggesting that the period of diminished vigor and ill health towards the end of life is being compressed. A recent series of articles in the Economist magazine suggest that we need a new term for people age 65 to 80, who are generally healthy and hearty, capable of knowledge-based work on an equal footing with 25-year-olds, and who are increasingly being shunted out of the workforce as if they were invalids or, well, “old.” Indeed, the a