Skip to main content

Changes in IRA & 401(K)s for 2012

Image
By
The IRS has made cost-of-living adjustments to IRAs and employer-sponsored retirement plans for 2012, so here is what you need to know about the newly altered contribution limits and phase-outs for these plans.

401(k) & IRA yearly contribution limits. In 2012, these are the annual contribution limits for some popular retirement savings vehicles.

·         401(k)s, 403(b)s, most 457 plans, Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) - $17,000 with an additional $5,500 catch-up contribution allowed for those 50 or older. (2012 COLA: $500.)
·         Traditional & Roth IRAs - $5,000 with an additional $1,000 catch-up contribution allowed for those 50 or older. (No 2012 COLA.)
·         Simple IRAs - $11,500 with an additional $2,500 catch-up contribution allowed for those 50 or older. (No 2012 COLA.)
·         SEP IRAs - $50,000 or 25% of an employee’s compensation, whichever is lesser. (2012 COLA: $1,000.)
·         415(b) defined benefit plans – the limitation on annual benefits under a defined benefit plan is increased to $200,000. (2012 COLA: $5,000.)1,2,3,4

With the increase, it's a good idea to check your contribution rate (in $ or %) to ensure you are still contributing the maximum amount, if that is your intent.


Traditional IRA phase-outs. The new MAGI limits affecting deductions for traditional IRA contributions are:

·         Singles & heads of household covered by a workplace retirement plan: $58,000-68,000. (2012 COLA: $2,000.)
·         Married filing jointly, with spouse making the IRA contribution covered by a workplace retirement plan: $92,000-112,000. (2012 COLA: $2,000.)
·         Married filing jointly, IRA contributor not covered by a workplace retirement plan but married to someone who is: $173,000-183,000. That MAGI range is for a couple rather than an individual. (2012 COLA: $4,000.)1

Roth IRA phase-outs. The MAGI limits affecting deductions for Roth IRA contributions are set as follows for 2012:

·         Singles & heads of household covered by a workplace retirement plan: $110,000-125,000. (2012 COLA: $3,000.)
·         Married filing jointly: $173,000-183,000. (2012 COLA: $4,000.)
·         Married filing separately, with the Roth IRA contributor covered by a workplace retirement plan: $0-10,000. (No 2012 COLA.)1

Lastly, a couple of notes for employers. When it comes to defining "key employees" in a top-heavy plan, the determination limit goes up $5,000 to $165,000 in 2012. The maximum taxable earnings amount for Social Security increases to $110,100 from $106,800.5

Best Regards,

Kevin Kroskey

Citations.
This article prepared by Peter Montoya.
1 www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=248482,00.html [10/20/11]
2 money.usnews.com/money/blogs/planning-to-retire/2011/10/21/401k-and-ira-changes-coming-in-2012 [10/21/11]
3 www.irs.gov/retirement/participant/article/0,,id=211345,00.html [10/20/11]
4 www.irs.gov/retirement/article/0,,id=111419,00.html#12 [10/21/11]
5 www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=cbc951c9-7f27-4a92-93e3-4c0193f51347 [10/20/11]
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Diversification: Disciplinarian of Disciplinarians

By
Disciplined diversification works when you do and even when you don't want it to. Diversification in effect forces you to sell the thing that has been doing so well in your portfolio and to buy the thing that hasn't. While this makes rational sense, it is emotionally difficult to execute. Think back to the tail end of 2008--were you selling bonds and cash to buy stocks? Most likely you weren't unless your advisor or some sort of automatic trigger did it for you. Carl Richards of www.behaviorgap.com provided a good reminder of how diversification works in a recent NY Times blog post. The diversification he discusses here is more so related to equity asset-class diversification but also touches on the three basic building blocks--equities, bonds, and cash. He doesn't discuss alternative asset classes -- an asset class that doesn't fit neatly into the three basic categories -- being used to further diversification, but that's a detailed topic for another day.
Read more

The Value of Double-Checking & Monitoring Your Retirement Strategy

By
Motivational speaker Denis Waitley once remarked, “You must stick to your conviction, but be ready to abandon your assumptions.” That statement certainly applies to retirement planning. Your effort must not waver, yet you must also examine it from time to time. 1       Perhaps you may realize that you under-estimated your health insurance costs and will need more retirement income than previously assumed. Or perhaps, with today's low interest rates you are not getting the level of investment returns you counted on. With those factors and others in mind, here are some signs that you may need to double-check your retirement strategy.     Your portfolio lacks significant diversification. Many baby boomers are approaching retirement with portfolios heavily weighted in U.S. equities. As many of them will have long retirements and a sustained need for growth investing, you could argue that this is entirely appropriate. Yet, U.S. equities by some measures may be over-valued by
Read more

65-80 Year Olds … A New and Exciting Demography

By
Should today’s 70-year-old American be considered “old?” How do you define that term these days? Statistically, your average 70-year-old has just a 2% chance of dying within a year. The estimated upper limits of average life expectancy is now 97, and a rapidly growing number of 70-year-olds will live past age 100. Perhaps more importantly, today’s 70-year-olds are in much better shape than their grandparents were at the same age. In most developed countries, healthy life expectancy from age 50 is growing faster than life expectancy itself, suggesting that the period of diminished vigor and ill health towards the end of life is being compressed. A recent series of articles in the Economist magazine suggest that we need a new term for people age 65 to 80, who are generally healthy and hearty, capable of knowledge-based work on an equal footing with 25-year-olds, and who are increasingly being shunted out of the workforce as if they were invalids or, well, “old.” Indeed, the a
Read more