Skip to main content

More Mutual Funds 'Time' Market

Through my experience as a Certified Financial Planner(r) in counseling clients and in staying abreast of changes of the financial product companies, it has become quite evident time and again that it is a lot easier to sell consumers what they think they want rather than to educate them on what they need. From insurance carriers and financial sales people selling 'guaranteed products' at exorbitant costs to mutual fund companies seeding multiple new funds and then promoting the ones that do well while silently closing the unsuccessful funds before they receive their Morningstar ratings, consumers are preyed upon and have to side step a mine field of damaging advice and products if they're to be successful and reach their life's goals.

The Wall Street machine certainly isn't slowing down. Rather than educating consumers on market history, so they can learn why the negative returns from The Great Recession--while not pleasant nor frequent--are in fact a part of investing, Wall Street is instead now more actively pushing products that prey upon consumers' recent and deep fears. Mutual funds that are aggressively trying to get in and out of the market, called market timing, are the new fad. A recent article from the Wall Street Journal, entitled More Mutual Funds 'Time' Market, describes why this is such a risky strategy.
"But academic research raises doubts that the typical fund manager can successfully time the market over the long haul. Anders Ekholm, adjunct professor at Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, recently analyzed more than 4,000 U.S. stock funds' returns between 2000 and 2007. Managers helped their performance through stock-picking, he found, but hurt their returns by market-timing.


There are a couple of reasons why the deck is stacked against market-timers, Mr. Ekholm says. Market-timing requires more trading, and transaction costs hurt performance. What's more, while a manager may relatively easily dig up some unique information that gives him an edge in selecting an individual stock, it's difficult to get such superior information about the overall market."
In my opinion the article is somewhat more favorable to market timing and stock picking than it should be, given the overwhelming academic evidence against them. There will always be money managers that get lucky and outperform, especially in the short run. However, to consistently guess right on both the prediction made and the timing involved in executing the investment strategy is virtually impossible to do.

Here's a prediction: looking back five years from today, a majority of the market-timing funds in existence today will underperform their benchmark--much more so than what one would expect from blind, random luck.  A small minority of the funds will outperform their benchmark--much less than what one would expect from blind, random luck. Yet these darlings will be touted in the financial media and will receive large inflows from investors chasing returns.

Then over the subsequent five year period, these investors will be disappointed as their chosen guru no long has the 'gu' or the 'ru' (aka 'luck') that enabled them previously outperform. This is the continual dance that Wall Street does with consumers and the consumers are consistently dazzled by Wall Street darlings only later to find the emperor has no clothes.

If investors truly realized there were no silver bullet and took the harder road of educating themselves or working with a financial planner that can guide them, I have no doubt they would be in better financial shape and have much greater peace of mind.

Click here to read the full Wall Street Journal article.


Bookmark and Share

Popular posts from this blog

Last Week Was Not One To Miss

Last week the Dow rose 7.3% last week amid earnings reports from many companies, as reported in the Wall Street Journal ( http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124782681174757379.html ). For most companies, it's not like the reports were necessarily good. It was that the news was not as bad as expected . This rapid rise in the market occurred despite poor economic news, including rising unemployment now predicted to go north of 10%. To many investors, this seems counter-intuitive: poor economic news and declining earnings reports compared to the same time last year yet the market goes up markedly. How come? It's quite simple actually. The market looks forward and reacts to new and unknowable information . So even though the news was bad, much of it was not as bad as expected . Thus the new information positively changed market expectations and prices adjusted upward. Unless you can predict the future, as investors we must stay invested through good times and bad to ensure we experien...

Are We All Socialists Now: Government Intervention and Stock Market Returns

As a recent Newsweek cover asked, "Are We All Socialists Now?" And if so, should U.S. equity investors be alarmed by the prospect of greater government intervention in the economy? Historical data looking at this very question may be surprising to you. Click the link below to watch a short 6 minute video, which provides some objective comparisons of stock market returns from the more free-market system in the U.S. compared to the returns from more interventionist governments from around the world. The evidence suggests that government intervention is just one factor among many affecting stock returns, and that an above-average degree of intervention is not necessarily associated with below-average returns. https://admin.acrobat.com/_a772887163/governmentinterventionandstockreturns/ To Your Prosperity ~ Kevin Kroskey

Bond Investors Misled by Wall Street Journal Article

In an article published today in the Wall Street Journal, entitled "The New Bond Equation," the author attempts to educate readers about the potential risks involved in investing in bond mutual funds, given the current economic environment. He writes: "As the financial crisis heads into its third year, investors in bond funds are facing some difficult choices. Investors usually turn to these funds for safety. But bond funds are facing a host of pressures that are driving down returns, raising long-term risk—and making it tougher to settle on the right investment strategy." While I agree with the author's statement above, he makes some statements that mislead bond investors. ( Click here to read the full article. ) For example, he writes: "....they’re buying vehicles that invest in intermediate-maturity bonds. These funds also typically hold a mix of government, mortgage and investment-grade corporate bonds, which spreads risk around. Even cautious intermedi...