Skip to main content

Deconstructing Berkshire Hathaway and Warren Buffett

Weston Wellington of Dimensional Fund Advisors often displays an ability to make unique observations and simplify complex concepts not unlike Warren Buffet. Below Wellington looks through Berkshire Hathaway's annual report and Buffett's letter to shareholders and makes some unique observations about the Berkshire portfolio and underlying investment principles that the every-day investor can learn from.

To Your Prosperity,

Kevin Kroskey, CFP, MBA

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Berkshire Hathaway released its 2010 annual report last weekend, including the letter to shareholders from Chairman Warren Buffett that is always eagerly awaited by the investment community. We are gratified to find that Mr. Buffett's legendary ability to simplify complex issues remains undiminished and his trademark wit is as sharp as ever.

Financial journalists, eager for clues that might reveal Buffett's thoughts on where markets are headed, focused on Buffett's optimistic outlook for the future ("America's best days lie ahead") and his appetite to make further large acquisitions ("my trigger finger is itchy").

We prefer to focus on a number of issues touched on in the letter that offer investment wisdom that should be just as useful ten years from now as it is today.

  • As of year-end 2010, Berkshire held positions in excess of $1 billion in fourteen common stocks. Five of these were non-U.S. firms: BYD Company Ltd. (China), Munich Re (Germany), POSCO (South Korea), Sanofi-Aventis (France), and Tesco plc (UK). Five years ago a similar list of twelve companies contained just one non-U.S. firm, and ten years ago there were none. In his comments about the future of America, Mr. Buffett remarked that "human potential is far from exhausted" and that, despite many setbacks, the American system "has worked wonders for over two centuries." Judging by Berkshire's portfolio, it appears this notion applies with equal force throughout the world.

  • Berkshire has willingly shouldered some unusual risks over the years. It acquired building products maker Johns Manville in 2000 despite the stigma of asbestos-related liabilities, invested over $15 billion in various financial firms in the tumultuous weeks following the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in 2008, and once insured an internet firm against the possibility of awarding a $1 billion prize associated with a marketing promotion. Many investors might assume that such adventurous and unconventional thinking in equity assets would be matched by an equally unorthodox approach in fixed income. On the contrary, Buffett's strategy for investing Berkshire's cash ($38 billion at year-end) is so conservative that some might accuse him of excessive caution. We suspect any institutional money manager with a balanced account mandate who maintained most of the fixed income assets in Treasury bills despite yields approaching zero would be fired for lack of imagination. Such an approach only makes sense if the role of fixed income is to preserve liquidity and limit the potential damage associated with riskier equities, rather than to generate satisfying returns. Mr. Buffett cites an observation from financial writer Raymond DeVoe that "more money has been lost reaching for yield than at the point of a gun."

  • For those who ponder why it is that stocks are expected to provide a positive rate of return even if they pay no current dividend, one number cited in the letter offers a clue: $1 billion. That is the approximate amount of cash that shows up in Berkshire's mailbox each month from its collection of seventy-six businesses. Mr. Buffett's job is to invest that cash in new projects that carry an attractive rate of return, and history shows that these may come in a variety of shapes and sizes. Last year, for example, Berkshire spent $50 million to buy Alabama's largest brick manufacturer and $22 billion to complete its acquisition of the nation's largest freight railroad. Mr. Buffett reports that the rail acquisition is working out "even better than I expected," and to the extent any chief executive can invest a firm's retained earnings more profitably than we can, dividends are not just unnecessary, they are undesirable.

Since taking control of a floundering Massachusetts textile mill in 1965, Warren Buffett has assembled an extraordinary record of business success. His oft-stated goal has been to grow Berkshire's book value at a faster rate than the total return of the S&P 500 Index, and he has certainly succeeded. While many have focused on his facility with numbers and his ability to identify attractive business opportunities, it seems to us there is a lot more to the story. Mr. Buffett may never forget a number you give him, but he also appears to be an astute judge of character and has a knack for quickly sizing up individuals whose business acumen and management style will make for a good fit within the Berkshire confederation.

What are the investment implications of this appealing story? Should we be confident that Berkshire shares will continue to outperform the market, at least as long as Mr. Buffett is at the helm?

To address this question, we should consider to what extent Mr. Buffett's skills are already reflected in Berkshire Hathaway's stock price and whether the S&P 500 Index is the most useful basis of comparison. Let us first acknowledge that Berkshire's long-run price performance relative to almost any benchmark is sensational—over the last 25 years it has compounded at 16.9% per year compared to 9.93% for the S&P 500 Index with reinvested dividends. The margin of superiority relative to the S&P 500 narrows for more recent time periods, however, and disappears altogether in comparison with broader-based equity strategies. Over the last fifteen years, for example, Berkshire shares have still outperformed the S&P 500 by 276 basis points per year, but fall a smidgen behind a globally diversified Dimensional Balanced Equity Index (16 basis points). Over the last ten years, Berkshire shares have underperformed the Balanced Index by an even larger amount: 295 basis points per year.

Some might be tempted to conclude from these results that Mr. Buffett's legendary skills are waning, but if markets are working properly the numbers should come as no surprise and are no reflection on Mr. Buffett's talents. Berkshire's book value has grown from $48 million in 1965 to $157 billion in 2010, making it larger, by this measure, than oil giant Exxon Mobil. Mr. Buffett has gone from piloting a speedboat to commanding an aircraft carrier; the ever-increasing amount of capital Berkshire oversees makes it difficult to earn above-average returns. Moreover, Berkshire Hathaway is not a mutual fund, but a public company with a share price that reflects expectations for the future. Now that Mr. Buffett's admirable qualities are understood and acknowledged by so many market participants, it seems likely that his perceived value is already reflected in Berkshire's stock price, just as Apple's current stock price reflects the genius of founder Steve Jobs.

We wish Mr. Buffett well and hope to be reading his letters for many years in the future. And investors who have a soft spot for Berkshire Hathaway shares can take comfort in the knowledge that if they own a truly diversified equity strategy, they own a piece of Berkshire.

Weston Wellington of Dimensional Fund Advisors

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2010, 2005, and 2000 shareholder letters. Available at http://www.berkshirehathaway.com (accessed February 27, 2011).
Dimensional Equity Balanced Index: Dimensional Fund Advisors.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.



Bookmark and Share

Popular posts from this blog

Don't File Your Taxes Too Soon

I'd like to remind everyone to not be too anxious to file your taxes. Many taxpayers rush to file their tax returns as quickly as possible. Ordinarily, that’s fine. But if you own mutual funds, don’t file your tax return before March 1. In past years, revised 1099s were often issued, reclassifying distributions and/or their amounts. This was a huge headache for the investors who had already filed tax returns based on the original documentation. These hapless consumers found themselves forced to redo their returns and file amended tax returns, adjusting the amount they owed or were due in refunds - and paying their tax preparer additional fees to do the extra work. It looks like 2010 may be the same. Therefore, if you own mutual funds, do not file your tax return before March 1. By then, any amended IRS forms are likely to arrive, potentially helping you avoid the hassle and costs of filing an amended return. Kevin Kroskey, CFP, MBA

Bangladesh Butter Production Predicts U.S. Stock Returns

After reading the title of this post, my hope is that a look of disbelief is cast on your face. Of course butter production in Bangladesh has nothing to do with prediction of US stock market returns. However, through data mining all sorts of 'relationships' can be demonstrated. Many mutual funds, ETFs, and trading strategies are built upon these data mining strategies--most often to the harm of investors that utilize them. As Jason Zweig describes in a recent article in the Wall Street Journal, entitled Data Mining Isn't a Good Bet For Stock-Market Predictions , "The stock market generates such vast quantities of information that, if you plow through enough of it for long enough, you can always find some relationship that appears to generate spectacular returns -- by coincidence alone . This sham is known as data mining." I recall in from my business statistics course in grad school, how I was able to show that ice cream consumption was correlated to the murder ra

Paying for College and Getting Your Money's Worth

According to the Student Loan Marketing Association (more commonly known as Sallie Mae Bank), the average tuition, room and board at a private college comes to $43,921. Public tuition for in-state students at state colleges amounted to $19,548 (about half of which is room and board), with out-of-state students paying an average of $34,031. How are parents and students finding the cash to afford this expense? Sallie Mae breaks it down as follows: 34% from scholarships and grants that don’t have to be paid back, coming from the college itself or the state or federal government, often based on need and academic performance. Parents typically pay 29% of the total bill (an average of $7,000) out of savings or income, and other family members (think: grandparents) are paying another 5%. The students themselves are paying for 12% of the cost, on average. The rest, roughly 20% of the total, is made up of loans.  The federal government’s loan program offers up to $5,500 a year fo