Skip to main content

Social Security: Common Mistakes and Misperceptions

Image
By
I find that retirees often have erroneous beliefs of Social Security and are blind to planning opportunities in claiming their benefits. Elaine Floyd, CFP is one of the foremost experts on Social Security planning within the financial planning community. In a recent newsletter she listed common mistakes both retirees and advisors make in addition to common misperceptions. These are posted below.

3 of the most common mistakes RETIREES make:

  1. Thinking of 62 as being "Social Security age" without realizing the penalties they pay by claiming early benefits. 
  2. Filing for benefits without understanding all the ramifications as to spousal benefits, survivor benefits, the earnings test, etc. 
  3. Failing to consider the lifetime value of Social Security over a long life expectancy and how it provides longevity insurance in the event of a very long life.

3 of the most common mistakes ADVISORS make:

  1. Focusing too much on the breakeven age without considering the importance of income at advanced ages, especially for surviving spouses. 
  2. Letting clients justify early filing at 62 for irrational reasons ("Social Security could go broke; I want my money now").
  3. Failing to fully understand all the rules for spousal and survivor benefits—that is, who can do what and when; knowing just enough to be dangerous.

3 of the most common "misperceptions" regarding Social Security planning:

  1. That you can do it without a calculator. People try to develop rules of thumb, but there are too many permutations of spouses' ages and benefit amounts to try to guess who should do what and when. 
  2. That people can get all the help they need from SSA personnel. SSA workers look at what benefits people are entitled to right now. They do not do long-range planning. 
  3. That Social Security exists in a vacuum. You have to consider all the other aspects of a client's financial plan, including IRAs, pensions, taxes, etc.
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Diversification: Disciplinarian of Disciplinarians

By
Disciplined diversification works when you do and even when you don't want it to. Diversification in effect forces you to sell the thing that has been doing so well in your portfolio and to buy the thing that hasn't. While this makes rational sense, it is emotionally difficult to execute. Think back to the tail end of 2008--were you selling bonds and cash to buy stocks? Most likely you weren't unless your advisor or some sort of automatic trigger did it for you. Carl Richards of www.behaviorgap.com provided a good reminder of how diversification works in a recent NY Times blog post. The diversification he discusses here is more so related to equity asset-class diversification but also touches on the three basic building blocks--equities, bonds, and cash. He doesn't discuss alternative asset classes -- an asset class that doesn't fit neatly into the three basic categories -- being used to further diversification, but that's a detailed topic for another day. ...
Read more

What Does $100 Buy You in Your Home State?

By
A new map released by the Tax Foundation shows exactly how far $100 would go in all 50 states. Using recently released data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Tax Foundation was able to show how the varying prices of goods, housing and income taxes in each state can impact consumers’ purchasing power. Southerners and Midwesterners have a serious edge over those along the East and West Coasts. A hundred bucks goes the furthest in Mississippi, where $100 will buy you what would cost $115.74 in another state that's closer to the national average. The next low-price states are Arkansas, Missouri, and Alabama. Ohio comes in at an encouraging $112.11 Meanwhile, $100 would only be worth $84.60 in the District of Columbia, the priciest state, $85.32 in Hawaii and $86.66 in New York. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/how-much--100-is-worth-in-your-state-152310027.html Click the Map Read More
Read more

Medals Per Million

By
By now, you've seen the final medal count at the London Olympics, and no doubt felt a stirring of national pride.   American athletes took home 104 total gold, silver and bronze medals, comfortably ahead of China (87), Russia (82), Great Britain (65), Germany (44), Japan (38), Australia (35), France (34), South Korea (28) and Italy (28).   Does that mean that we Americans--so often accused of being a nation of couch potatoes--are the most athletic people in the world?   Total medal count is one way to measure, but it may not be the best.   Another measurement would take into account the relative number of medals compared to a country's total population: Olympic medals per capita, or (to avoid many decimal places) the number of medals each nation took home per million people in its population. Medals per million gives us a very different ranking.   By this measure, citizens of the Caribbean island of Granada are by far the most athletic, with 9.5 Ol...
Read more