Skip to main content

Biases Affecting Your Brain and Financial Decision Making, As Told By Real Vs. Imagined Crime

Image
By
Crime in America is totally out of control these days, right? Every day you read about some new shooting, robbery, kidnapping etc., and the impression you get is that we live in an age where the streets are not safe and neither is your home.
 
Some of this phenomenon is not crime-related at all. Rather, it is in part stemming from a cognitive bias our brains experience called the recency or availability bias. From Wikipedia, “The tendency to overestimate the likelihood of events with greater "availability" in memory, which can be influenced by how recent the memories are or how unusual or emotionally charged they may be.” 
 
This bias shows may perpetrate your brain after being exposed to various emotionally charged stories and experiences. With money, for example, in the Great Recession in 2008, the recency bias may have caused you to think that the stock market is only going to continue to go down and not recover, given the recency, availability of information and media stories, and emotional reaction the severe stock market decline caused for many at that time. 
 
As for crime, when the Pew Research Center looked at the FBI figures for the quarter century from 1993 through 2015, they came to a somewhat different conclusion than what may be in our brain. Crime in America is actually falling at an impressive rate, when measured by violent crime per 100,000 residents, violent victimizations per 1,000 people, property crime per 100,000 residents or property victimizations per 1,000 households. (See chart) The news about crime, despite relentless headlines and campaign slogans, is almost uniformly good—and has been for some time.
 
The FBI data covers 18,000 different U.S. jurisdictions, while the victimization figures come from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The former reflects reported crimes only, while the latter is a series of polls of individuals who are asked whether they were victims of a crime in the past six months, whether they reported it or not. The decline in violent crime ranged from 50% (FBI statistics) to 77% (BJS data), while the drop in property crime ranged from 48% to 69% respectively.
 
It appears that this story is not getting out to a mainstream audience. Twenty-one Gallup surveys conducted since 1989 show that most Americans believed there was more crime in the U.S. compared with the year before, despite the general trend downward. In late 2016, a Pew Research Center survey found that 57% of registered voters believed crime had gotten worse since 2008, even though the actual statistics showed that violent and property crime rates had declined by double-digit percentages during that span.
 
Where are you more likely to be a victim in our safer world? The reports show that there were more than 600 violent crimes per 100,000 residents in the states of Alaska, Nevada, New Mexico, and Tennessee. The least violent states, with fewer than 200 violent crimes per 100,000 residents, were Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Virginia. Chicago has drawn widespread attention for its murder rate, but the actual rate in 2015—18 murders and non-negligent manslaughters per 100,000 residents—was far lower than the rate in two cities that are not making the news: St. Louis (59) and Baltimore (55). 


To Your Prosperity,

Kevin Kroskey, CFP®, MBA

This article adapted with permission from BobVeres.com.
Source: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/21/5-facts-about-crime-in-the-u-s/
 

Popular posts from this blog

Healthcare Reform Explained

By
If you're like me, you find the 1000 page plus Heathcare Reform Act a bit confusing. This nine minute animated movie -- featuring the "YouToons" -- explains the problems with the current health care system, the changes that are happening now, and the big changes coming in 2014, produced by the Kaiser Family Foundation. Kevin Kroskey, CFP, MBA
Read more

The Cruel Psychology of the 1,000-Point Drop

By
If you don't already read Jason Zweig's regular column in the Wall Street Journal, you should. He is one of the few financial journalists worth reading. His recent article on the psychology of the recent market drop is rational and instructive. ==== Click here to read the article in it's entirety: http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2015/08/24/the-cruel-psychology-of-the-1000-point-drop/ See below for a snippet: Experiments have shown , for instance, that people believe cancer is riskier when they are told that it kills “1,286 out of 10,000 people” than when they hear that it kills “24.14 out of 100 people.” Hearing “1,286” immediately brings a large number of victims to mind, while “24.14” is simply a much smaller number. To notice that the first number is less than 13%, while the second is more than 24%, you have to focus on the denominators of the fractions and do some quick division. But your emotions will likely hijack your brain long before you get to that poi...
Read more

Did You Do as Well as Your Mutual Fund?

By
It's common practice to look at a fund's total return number for a snapshot of what performance to expect, but that won't give you the full picture. Morningstar studies have shown that investors' actual gains frequently pale in comparison to reported total return numbers. This phenomenon frequently plays out among funds that attract assets after streaks of hot performance, only to see some investors get skittish at the first signs of underperformance . After a moment's though, even a novice investor will realize that this behavior is just the opposite of the mantra -- buy low and sell high. This practice can be more broadly attributed to bad behavior and lack of a plan or philosophy when it comes to investing. Investors are human and humans are emotional. As much as the logician in me would like to believe my left brain is working to drive my decision making, logic comes in after emotions are experienced to provide context for how we are feeling and not the other ...
Read more